Insights: Publications 6 Key Takeaways | Recent Developments in U.S. Trademark and Unfair Competition Law
Kilpatrick partner Ted Davis spoke recently on recent developments in U.S. trademark and unfair competition law as part of Kilpatrick's "IP Innovations" series.
That presentation addressed, inter alia, the following topics:
-
The precipitous decline in precedential opinions from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board;
-
The continued post-Jack Daniel's viability of the restrictive test for infringement first articulated in Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), in cases not presenting trademark uses by defendants;
-
Judicial preoccupation with actionable uses in commerce by defendants;
-
The Ninth Circuit's continued incoherent and inconsistent applications of the nominative fair use doctrine;
-
The disposal of claims of consumer standing in inter partes proceedings; and
-
Possible—but perhaps not actual—guardrails on the failure-to-function ground for the refusal of applications by the USPTO.
For more information, please contact:
Ted Davis: tdavis@ktslaw.com
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
